Simmons v WCAB (Powertrack International), __ A.3d __ (Pa. Cmwlth., No. 2168 C.D. 2013, filed July 24, 2014).

 

Through his appeal, the claimant argued that the employer failed to demonstrate that his condition had changed since a prior termination proceeding. Specifically, the claimant argued that the only change recognized by the employer’s medical expert was that of symptom magnification and/or malingering. The Court deemed a diagnosis of malingering to be a sufficient change in condition to support a modification of benefits, if it leads a medical expert to conclude that the claimant’s disability or ability to work has changed. The modification of benefits was affirmed.

 




Ready to Get Help?

Complete the short form below to get your FREE consultation.